Wednesday, 2 January 2013

Nit picking? Aaah, afraid so...


My choice was to either write my blog or go back through my childrens’ hair checking for another head lice reinfestation.  So here I am blogging.   And giving my head a little scratch.

If your mum told you that you never had nits, she is a very lovely mum… and is lying!   She would have had to write the note to the teacher… “Lisa was absent yesterday as I had to treat her hair for head lice”, she had to inform your best friend’s mum that she sent home more from the party than intended.  Maybe, like me, she would have found a morbid fascination as she combed out hundreds of little buggers at different stages in their life cycle from her childrens’ and, let’s face it, her own hair.   

While I cannot shake that image out of my mind (or my hair for that matter), I have to ask: How can the human race, so advanced that we are able to take a photo of our food at a café with our telephone and send it into cyberspace so others can admire it on their electronic devices all over the world, not have figured out how to eradicate head lice??  They are pretty tiny – and no opposable thumbs!?

I know why.  Because no one has ever run a digital activism campaign to stop the nits!  Like that status on Facebook.  Retweet it to all your followers.  Upload some parodies about nits on You Tube.  That will stop them.  Hhhmmm

Sivitanides,M and Shah, V claim that activism is now sharper and more focussed thanks to the rise and rise of digital technology, but they do offer that there are three ways of viewing the value of digital activism.  The optimistic approach infers the hope that the use of digital technologies will ‘change the nature of power in the real world.’   The pessimistic perspective suggests that while one group uses digital technology to organise and act, so too can other groups use the technology to continue to oppress (head lice treatment manufacturers?).  The persistent approach recognises that the technology is being used to facilitate activism that was already possible, albeit, maybe faster and wider-reaching.

Mandy Cropper makes the point beautifully in her blog: if digital activism is as easy as clicking a button, we can all be involved, but is it really making a difference?   Henry Jenkins speaks about social media being the ‘technology of collective intelligence’.  The new ‘participatory culture’ reacts to digitally shared information in the digital space, but in my opinion, it is important to give credit to real people for creating change in real life.  From the French Revolution, to the Suffragettes, to Indian women and their supporters right now, the activism and desire for change is coming from their hearts, not the tips of their fingers.

It seems that my digital activism against head lice will only go as far as my fingertips scratching my head.  I realise my campaign against nits will probably stay my own, as bigger things are happening in the world.  I am excited to see how people will continue to explore how technology will help their cause.

But just in case, please like the No More Lice Facebook page if you see one.



Image source: Author unknown, Giant Insects Attack the Drive-in theatre, viewed 2 January 2013, http://cubadhl.blogspot.com.au/2010_01_01_archive.html

2 comments:

  1. Hi Lisa this was grossly entertaining and I too support your No More Lice crusade. It got me thinking as to why scientists haven't thought of a mini hair bomb (the type that gases them out not explodes :S) probably because no one wants to work with them.

    Social media can raise awareness & cteate exposure for a particular cause but creating change has to occur with real action in the non-digital world. Though the line between the real world & the digital world is starting to become a bit fuzzy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lisa, your blogs are always entertaining and informative at the same time, and you have succeeded once again! Luckily we haven't had any head lice infestations in our house (yet), but I do look forward to that day coming in the near future as my children reach school age...
    I agree with you that credit really should go to the people who make real change in the real world - those people who are out there, working tirelessly, campaigning for a better world for all of us. Giving up their comfortable lifestyle, getting out there, making the necessary sacrifices to bring to our attention the problems that others are facing and taking real action to change the situation. Most of these people are never recognised for their contribution, and yet on the flip side we now have this myriad of websites, Facebook pages, organisations, causes and whatever else that bring to our attention the issues of the world. Who will be the voice for the people on the ground? Maybe we should start a Facebook page for them!

    ReplyDelete